Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Atlanta, GA
After a normal landing, the left main landing gear collapsed during the landing roll, which resulted in the airplane impacting the runway on its left belly and dragging the left wing about 3,800 ft down the paved surface of the runway before coming to rest. The left wing sustained substantial damage. Postaccident operational testing of the airplane’s landing gear system revealed that the left main landing gear down lock actuator did not provide adequate pressure to lock the landing gear, which allowed the landing gear to retract upon landing. Visual examination of the actuator did not reveal any anomalies, and it was not leaking fluid. No additional examination of the left landing gear actuator was performed.
Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Directional control-Capability exceeded
On November 30, 2023, at 1318 eastern standard time, a Raytheon Aircraft Company 400A airplane, N800SD, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident at Dekalb-Peachtree Airport (PDK), Atlanta, Georgia. The airline transport pilot and a commercial pilot were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 positioning flight. According to the pilots, shortly after being cleared for landing on runway 3R at PDK, they configured the airplane for landing and completed the before-landing checklist. They did not observe any abnormalities; the landing gear position indicator showed three green lights and no red handle, which indicated a safe landing gear configuration. The pilots stated that they made a normal landing in the touchdown zone, but during the first part of the landing roll there was a “violent” left yaw and they lost directional control. The airline transport pilot, who was the pilot flying, used full right rudder deflection and aileron to keep the airplane centered on the runway; simultaneously, the landing gear unsafe horn sounded. The commercial pilot then noticed that the landing gear handle was illuminated red, indicating unsafe gear, and the green light for the left main landing gear had extinguished. The airplane was tilted left with the left wing dragging on the runway, then on the grass, before the airplane came to rest about 3,800 ft down the runway. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that the left main landing gear was collapsed, and the airplane had sustained substantial damage to the left outboard wing, flaps, and aileron. During recovery of the airplane, airport personnel lowered the left main landing gear and towed the airplane to a hangar. After recovery of the airplane, an operational test of the landing gear system revealed that the left landing gear actuator did not lock the left landing gear. Visual examination of the left landing gear actuator did not reveal any anomalies, and it was not leaking fluid. After the actuator was replaced with another actuator, the landing gear functioned normally. No additional examination of the accident landing gear actuator was performed.