Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

March 29, 2024 · Jmmt VANS RV9A NO Series · N387E

Jasper, GA

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
March 29, 2024
Injury Outcomes
1 injury (1 serious injury)
Location
Jasper, GA
Aircraft
Jmmt VANS RV9A NO Series (2024)
Tail Number
N387E
Injuries
Serious
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
ERA24LA158

The purpose of the flight was for the private pilot/builder of the experimental amateur-built airplane to complete the second flight of the phase one flight testing. The pilot planned to remain near the airport and obtain engine performance data. The pilot reported that after a normal takeoff, he maneuvered in the area and observed normal engine performance, and he then descended to return to the airport traffic pattern. The pilot reported that while approaching a left downwind for landing, he observed the engine rpm decline and the Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS) timer announced, “change fuel tank.” The pilot engaged the fuel boost pump and switched from the left to right fuel tank, which was followed by a complete loss of engine power. The pilot elected to land in a field, and during the landing roll, the left wing struck a utility pole. The fuselage and left wing sustained substantial damage. Examination of the engine found no evidence of preimpact mechanical malfunction or failure that would have precluded normal operation and fuel was found in the right tank after the accident. During examination of the fuel system and selector, the right tank fuel line b-nut exhibited low torque, which could have resulted in a total loss of power due to fuel starvation. Although it is possible that the loose B-nut at the fuel selector allowed air into the fuel line when the pilot switched to the right fuel tank, due to the impact damage sustained to other areas of the fuel lines, and lack of recorded data from the multifunction display, the reason for the fuel starvation could not be determined.

NTSB Probable Cause

The total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation for reasons that could not be determined due to impact-related damage.

Full Narrative

On March 29, 2024, about 1141 eastern daylight time, an experimental amateur-built Vans RV9A airplane, N387E, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Pickens County Airport (JZP), Jasper, Georgia. The private pilot sustained serious injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 test flight. A part-owner/builder of the airplane stated that the the accident flight was the second flight during the phase one flight testing and the airplane had accumulated about one hour of total time. The accident pilot, who was also a builder of the airplane stated that the purpose was to remain near the JZP airport and obtain engine performance data. The pilot reported that after a normal takeoff, he maintained 4,000 ft mean sea level near the airport to observe engine performance. The observations were unremarkable, and he then descended to return to the airport traffic pattern. The pilot reported that while approaching a left downwind for runway 34, he observed engine rpm decline and the EFIS timer announced, “change fuel tank.” The pilot subsequently engaged the fuel boost pump and switched from the left to right fuel tank, which was followed by a complete loss of engine power. The pilot elected to land in a field, and during the landing the left wing struck a utility pole. The pilot recalled that the boost pump remained running after the forced landing, and he subsequently shut the pump off. According to the part-owner and builder of the airplane, who was monitoring the test flight operations from the ground, the preflight was normal and the pilot radioed to him after about 15 minutes of flying that everything was proceeding normally. After hearing an emergency locator transmitter (ELT) sound over the radio, he was able to locate the accident site within a few minutes. He observed that the fuel selector was selected to the right tank and during recovery operations, about 2.5 gallons of fuel was drained from the right wing, with additional fuel in the grass surrounding the accident site. According to a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector who examined the airplane at the accident site, the airplane impacted the utility pole and the left wing was partially separated from the fuselage. The left wing and fuselage sustained substantial damage. Examination of the airplane and engine found that the fuel strainer contained about 4 ounces of clean fuel. The mechanical fuel pump was tested and found operational. The fuel vent in the right wing tank was clear and vented normally. The inspector removed the fuel selector and discovered that the right fuel tank line "B" nut (located at the fuel selector) exhibited low torque. There was no evidence of fuel staining or leaking around the fuel selector. The fuel line from the fuel selector to the engine was dislodged from impact damage. An engine test run was attempted. Due to impact damage, the starter would only partially engage; however, the engine exhibited continuity and the Nos. 1 and 4 cylinders fired during the test. Review of the carburetor icing probability chart found that the engine was not at risk for icing during the flight. The airplane was equipped with an Advanced Flight Systems AF-5600 multifunction display. Data was downloaded from the device; however, the files contained no flight data.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time11:41 EDT
Nearest AirportPickens County Airport (2nm WNW)
Runway16/3
Runway Length5000 ft
Runway Width100 ft
Flight Plan FiledNone
Flight Plan ActivatedNo
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftJmmt VANS RV9A NO Series
Tail NumberN387E
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsLycoming Experimental Rebuilt · O-320 · Reciprocating · 160
Seats2

People & Injuries

Injury Summary1 injury (1 serious injury)
Fatal0
Serious1
Minor0
Uninjured0
Total1
Crew 1Age 82 · Basc · Serious

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind310° @ 10 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point61 F / 27 F
Altimeter30.24 inHg
Observation Time11:35
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data