Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

March 30, 2024 · Piper PA-24-250 NO Series · N7538P

North Kingstown, RI

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
March 30, 2024
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (2 uninjured)
Location
North Kingstown, RI
Aircraft
Piper PA-24-250 NO Series (1961)
Tail Number
N7538P
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
ERA24LA164

On March 30, 2024, about 1451 EDT, a Piper PA-24-250, N7538P, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near North Kingstown, Rhode Island. The private pilot and one passenger were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot stated that she flew the airplane earlier that day on two uneventful flights that lasted about 1 hour 45 minutes. Prior to the third flight, which was the accident flight, she performed a walk around inspection using the preflight checklist. She then started the engine and taxied to the runway where she performed the before takeoff checklist with no discrepancies reported. She departed with the fuel selector positioned to the right tank and proceeded to the destination airport. When the airplane was 10 miles from the destination airport, she contacted the tower and was informed to expect a straight in approach to runway 23 and to call a 2-mile final. When the airplane was 5 miles from the airport she began the pre-landing checklist, and continued to the airport. As the flight continued she noticed the airplane was low based on the precision approach path indicator, and when at about 800 ft and between ½ and 1-mile from the runway she added power but the engine did not respond. She complied with the engine-out checklist but did not move the fuel selector or apply carburetor heat, but did move the ignition switch, although the engine did not respond. She announced an emergency to the tower controller and the passenger unlocked and unlatched the passenger entry door prior to ditching the airplane in Narragansett Bay. The airplane was recovered and retained for further examination.

NTSB Probable Cause

A total loss of engine power during final approach due to the pilot’s failure to recognize that the environmental conditions were susceptible to carburetor icing and apply carburetor heat, which resulted in the formation of carburetor ice. Contributing to the accident was the low altitude at which the pilot recognized the loss of engine power, reducing the amount of time to troubleshoot and address the problem.

Full Narrative

On March 30, 2024, about 1448 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-24-250 airplane, N7538P, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near North Kingstown, Rhode Island. The private pilot and one passenger were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot stated that she flew the airplane earlier that day on two uneventful flights that lasted about 1 hour 45 minutes. Before the third flight, which was the accident flight, she performed a walk-around inspection of the airplane using the preflight checklist. She then started the engine and taxied to the runway, where she performed the before-takeoff checklist with no engine discrepancies observed. She departed with the fuel selector positioned to the right tank and proceeded to the destination airport. When the flight was 10 miles from the destination airport, she contacted the air traffic tower controller, who told her to expect a straight-in approach to runway 23 and to report when on a 2-mile final. When the airplane was 5 miles from the airport, the pilot began performing the prelanding checklist, which included turning on the electric fuel pumps. When the flight was about 1/2 to 1 mile from the runway and about 800 ft agl, the pilot noticed that the airplane was low based on the precision approach path indicator, so she increased the throttle, but the engine did not respond. The pilot verified that the mixture was full rich and that the fuel selector was on the fullest tank, and she checked the magnetos but did not apply carburetor heat. She observed that engine power was not restored. She declared an emergency to the tower controller, the passenger unlocked and unlatched the entry door (because the flight was over water while on the approach), and the pilot ditched the airplane into Narragansett Bay. Postaccident examination of the airplane identified substantial damage (including compression buckling) on both sides of the fuselage aft of the engine firewall, the right side of the aft fuselage, and the left side of the fuselage aft and slightly below the aft window. About 30 gallons of 100 low lead fuel and 4 gallons of water were drained from the wing tanks. Examination of the engine revealed that the throttle, propeller, mixture, and carburetor heat controls remained attached to their respective attach points, and all but the throttle control could be manipulated. The throttle control could not be moved due to postaccident corrosion. Crankshaft, camshaft, and valvetrain continuity was confirmed. Examination of the ignition, oil lubrication, and electric fuel pumps revealed no evidence of preimpact failure or malfunction. Examination of the engine-driven fuel pump revealed suction and pressure at the inlet and outlet fittings during hand actuation. Disassembly of the pump revealed that a piece of foreign material, about 1 inch long, 0.75 inch wide, and less than 0.05 inch thick, was found in the inlet section of the pump. The foreign material and all flexible fuel hoses from the engine compartment were sent to the NTSB Materials Laboratory for examination. The NTSB Materials Laboratory determined that the foreign material was consistent with nitrile rubber and that its composition matched the inner layer material of one of the recovered fuel hoses. Bisection of all the recovered fuel hoses revealed that none exhibited any missing or separated inner layer material. By design, the airplane’s engine-driven fuel pump delivered fuel to the carburetor, and the electric fuel pumps, which connect in parallel, provide redundancy and a means to bypass the engine-driven fuel pump in the event of its obstruction or failure. According to the airplane’s owner’s handbook, the approach and landing checklist specified to turn on the electric fuel pumps but to leave carburetor heat off unless icing conditions existed. The handbook’s engine failure checklist specified, in part, to turn on the electric fuel pumps, push the mixture control to full rich, apply carburetor heat, and check the ignition switch. The recorded temperature and dew point at the destination airport about the time of the accident were 55°F and 24.8°F, respectively. The calculated relative humidity for these conditions was 30.45%. According to the carburetor icing probability chart contained in FAA Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin CE-09-35, these conditions were favorable for the formation of carburetor icing at glide and cruise power.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time14:48 EDT
Nearest AirportQuonset State (0.8nm ENE)
Runway23
Runway Length4000 ft
Runway Width75 ft
Flight Plan FiledNone
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftPiper PA-24-250 NO Series
Tail NumberN7538P
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsLycoming · O-540-A1D5 · Reciprocating · 250
Seats4

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (2 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured2
Total2
Crew 1Age 48 · Second Class · None

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind320° @ 20 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point55 F / 25 F
Altimeter29.64 inHg
Observation Time14:48
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data