Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

June 27, 2024 · Air Tractor AT-301 · N3165C

Andover, MO

Overview

Report Status
Probable Cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
June 27, 2024
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (1 uninjured)
Location
Andover, MO
Aircraft
Air Tractor AT-301 (1984)
Tail Number
N3165C
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
CEN24LA241

The pilot was conducting an agricultural flight when the airplane was unable to maintain altitude and airspeed during cruise flight between the departure airport and the field to be fertilized. The pilot reported that the engine continued to operate normally, and all the engine instruments (engine RPM, manifold pressure, oil pressure, fuel pressure, and oil temperature) indicated normal values for the airplane in a cruise flight configuration with the flaps retracted. The pilot verified that the mixture and throttle positions were correct before she increased the throttle, but there was no increase in engine power and the airplane continued to descend. The pilot began to jettison the 1,700 lbs of dry fertilizer as she maneuvered the airplane toward a nearby open field. The airplane’s left wing clipped a tree as the airplane descended into the field. The airplane subsequently landed hard and came to rest upright in the field. The fuselage, engine mounts, and both wings were substantially damaged during the hard landing. The airplane’s wing fuel tanks remained intact and contained ample fuel that exhibited the color and odor of automobile fuel. A review of airworthiness documentation revealed that the airplane was not authorized to use automobile fuel. When interviewed, the airplane owner/operator acknowledged that the airplane did not have a supplemental type certificate (STC) to use the 87-octane automobile fuel that he sourced from a local gas station. According to a company that specializes in issuance of automobile fuel STCs, the use of automobile fuel containing ethanol can result in damage to rubber and aluminum fuel system components, increases the volatility of the fuel, and can absorb significant amounts of water. Carburetor icing can develop faster with higher volatility fuels. Additionally, older engine designs like the airplane’s Pratt & Whitney R-1340-59 radial engine, are suspectable to valve seat recession if the fuel used contains an insufficient level of lead. When asked, the airplane operator indicated that he did not check the automobile gas for the presence of ethanol, nor did he blend aviation fuel to increase the lead content of the automobile fuel. The airplane’s radial engine separated from the fuselage during the accident and was not examined during the investigation.

NTSB Probable Cause

The pilot’s inability to maintain altitude and airspeed during cruise flight likely due to a decrease in engine performance associated with the unauthorized use of automobile fuel, which led to an inflight collision with a tree and hard landing.

Full Narrative

The pilot was conducting an agricultural flight when the airplane was unable to maintain altitude and airspeed during cruise flight between the departure airport and the field to be fertilized. The pilot reported that the engine continued to operate normally, and all the engine instruments (engine RPM, manifold pressure, oil pressure, fuel pressure, and oil temperature) indicated normal values for the airplane in a cruise flight configuration with the flaps retracted. The pilot verified that the mixture and throttle positions were correct before she increased the throttle, but there was no increase in engine power and the airplane continued to descend. The pilot began to jettison the 1,700 lbs of dry fertilizer as she maneuvered the airplane toward a nearby open field. The airplane’s left wing clipped a tree as the airplane descended into the field. The airplane subsequently landed hard and came to rest upright in the field. The fuselage, engine mounts, and both wings were substantially damaged during the hard landing. The airplane’s wing fuel tanks remained intact and contained ample fuel that exhibited the color and odor of automobile fuel. A review of airworthiness documentation revealed that the airplane was not authorized to use automobile fuel. When interviewed, the airplane owner/operator acknowledged that the airplane did not have a supplemental type certificate (STC) to use the 87-octane automobile fuel that he sourced from a local gas station. According to a company that specializes in issuance of automobile fuel STCs, the use of automobile fuel containing ethanol can result in damage to rubber and aluminum fuel system components, increases the volatility of the fuel, and can absorb significant amounts of water. Carburetor icing can develop faster with higher volatility fuels. Additionally, older engine designs like the airplane’s Pratt & Whitney R-1340-59 radial engine, are suspectable to valve seat recession if the fuel used contains an insufficient level of lead. When asked, the airplane operator indicated that he did not check the automobile gas for the presence of ethanol, nor did he blend aviation fuel to increase the lead content of the automobile fuel. The airplane’s radial engine separated from the fuselage during the accident and was not examined during the investigation.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time10:40 CDT
Nearest Airport0nm
Flight Plan FiledNone
Flight Plan ActivatedNo
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftAir Tractor AT-301
Tail NumberN3165C
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
Operating RulePart 137
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsPratt & Whitney · R-1340-59 · Reciprocating · 650
Seats1

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (1 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured1
Total1
Crew 1Age 23 · Second Class · None

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind140° @ 6 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point63 F
Altimeter29.99 inHg
Observation Time10:53
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data