Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Gainesville, FL
The student pilot and flight instructor described that during the landing roll the student pilot smelled a “burnt” smell, and that as the airplane continued to slow, drifted to the left. The student applied right rudder, but the airplane did not respond. He then applied the brakes and the nose landing gear immediately collapsed. The lower forward portion of the airplane’s fuselage was substantially damaged during the accident sequence. A Federal Aviation Administration inspector examined the airplane after the accident and provided photos of his findings that were examined in detail. The examinations revealed that the nose landing gear fork was separated from the upper portion of the nose landing gear assembly. Additionally, one of the nuts securing the nose landing gear’s axle was missing, while the threads on the axle were intact. The opposite end of the axle retained its nut, which was still secured with a cotter pin. The nose landing gear fork fracture surfaces exhibited fracture features consistent with overstress, and signatures consistent with the nosewheel rubbing against it before the fracture occurred. Based on this information, it is likely that one of the nuts securing the nosewheel axle was not properly secured and separated from the axle. This allowed the axle to displace laterally, resulting in the nosewheel making contact with the fork, and its subsequent failure.
The separation of a nose landing gear axle retaining nut and the subsequent the failure of the nose landing gear during landing.
The student pilot and flight instructor described that during the landing roll the student pilot smelled a “burnt” smell, and that as the airplane continued to slow, drifted to the left. The student applied right rudder, but the airplane did not respond. He then applied the brakes and the nose landing gear immediately collapsed. The lower forward portion of the airplane’s fuselage was substantially damaged during the accident sequence. A Federal Aviation Administration inspector examined the airplane after the accident and provided photos of his findings that were examined in detail. The examinations revealed that the nose landing gear fork was separated from the upper portion of the nose landing gear assembly. Additionally, one of the nuts securing the nose landing gear’s axle was missing, while the threads on the axle were intact. The opposite end of the axle retained its nut, which was still secured with a cotter pin. The nose landing gear fork fracture surfaces exhibited fracture features consistent with overstress, and signatures consistent with the nosewheel rubbing against it before the fracture occurred. Based on this information, it is likely that one of the nuts securing the nosewheel axle was not properly secured and separated from the axle. This allowed the axle to displace laterally, resulting in the nosewheel making contact with the fork, and its subsequent failure.