Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

September 20, 2024 · Piper PA-44-180 · N2083D

Shakopee, MN

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
September 20, 2024
Injury Outcomes
2 injuries (2 serious injuries)
Location
Shakopee, MN
Aircraft
Piper PA-44-180 (1978)
Tail Number
N2083D
Operator
Thunderbird Aircraft
Injuries
Serious
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
CEN24LA360

One of the pilots, a flight instructor, was recently hired to instruct in the airplane and was receiving a check out flight from the assistant chief flight instructor. The pilots reported that they were preparing to enter the traffic pattern, so they began a descent from their cruising altitude of about 5,500 ft msl to 1,000 ft msl. About three miles from the airport, both engines on the multi-engine airplane began to run rough. Shortly thereafter, both engines lost all power. Despite the pilots advancing the propellers, mixtures, and throttles to their full forward position, engine power was not restored. The airplane continued to descend, and the pilots performed an off-airport landing onto a field. One of the pilots stated that they did not perform an emergency checklist because there was no checklist for a dual engine failure. Also, due to their proximity to the ground, they did not have time to perform an emergency checklist. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage and both wings. A postaccident examination revealed that there were about 25 gallons of fuel in each nacelle, and both fuel selectors were in the “ON” position. The carburetor heat for each engine was in the “OFF” position. Examination of the engines and fuel system did not reveal any mechanical anomalies or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The recorded temperature and dew point near the accident site were conducive to “serious icing” at glide power settings. The pilot operating handbook for the airplane stated that carburetor heat should be used “as required” during approach and landing or if engine roughness occurs. Based on this information, it is likely that carburetor ice formed while the throttles were retarded during the descent which resulted in the initial engine roughness and subsequent loss of engine power due to carburetor ice.

NTSB Probable Cause

The pilots’ failure to apply carburetor heat during the descent, which resulted in a loss of power on both engines due to carburetor ice.

Full Narrative

On September 20, 2024, at 12:04 central daylight time, a Piper PA-44-180 airplane, N2083D, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Shakopee, Minnesota. Both pilots were seriously injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 instructional flight. One of the pilots, a flight instructor, was recently hired to instruct in the airplane and was receiving a check out flight from the assistant chief flight instructor. According to both pilots, they departed Flying Cloud Airport (FCM) for a local one-hour flight. The run-up, taxi, and takeoff were all normal. The airplane departed to the southwest and climbed to about 5,500 ft mean sea level. The flight instructor receiving the check-out performed several flight maneuvers in the airplane, then began a descent and proceeded back to FCM. About 3 miles from FCM, and about 800 ft to 1,000 ft above ground level, the right engine began to lose power followed by a loss of manifold pressure. Shortly thereafter, the left engine lost power accompanied by a decrease in manifold pressure. Then both engines lost power completely. The assistant chief flight instructor took control of the airplane while the other pilot pushed the mixture, propeller, and throttle controls to their full forward position, but the airplane continued to lose altitude. The pilots executed a forced landing to a field southwest of FCM. The assistant chief flight instructor stated that they did not execute an emergency checklist because there was no checklist for a dual engine failure, nor did they have time due to their proximity to the ground. The wings, fuselage, and empennage sustained substantial damage. A postaccident examination revealed that there were about 25 gallons of fuel in each nacelle, and both fuel selectors were in the “on” position. No water was detected in the fuel contained in either engine carburetor float bowl. Valvetrain continuity was established in both engines. Compression was achieved on all cylinders when the crankshaft was rotated in each engine. The magnetos on both engines produced spark when their respective impulse couplings were rotated. The carburetor heat for both engines were in the up or “off” position. The temperature, 24°C, and dew point, 12°C, recorded at the destination airport were conducive to “serious icing” at glide power setting. According to the pilot operating handbook for the airplane, carburetor heat should be used “as required” during approach and landing and if engine roughness occurs.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time12:04 CDT
Nearest AirportFlying Cloud Airport (4nm SSW)
Flight Plan FiledNone
Flight Plan ActivatedNo
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftPiper PA-44-180
Tail NumberN2083D
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
OperatorThunderbird Aircraft
Operating RulePart 91
Engines2
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsLycoming · O-360-E1A6D · Reciprocating · 180 | Lycoming · O-360-E1A6D · Reciprocating · 180
Seats4

People & Injuries

Injury Summary2 injuries (2 serious injuries)
Fatal0
Serious2
Minor0
Uninjured0
Total2
Crew 1Age 47 · Second Class · Serious
Crew 2Age 69 · Second Class · Serious

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind270° @ 9 kt, gusting 17 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point54 F
Altimeter29.83 inHg
Observation Time11:53
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data