Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Farlinville, KS
The pilot reported that he was descending the airplane to begin patrolling a section of pipeline when, without warning, the engine began to surge between low and high power. He diverted towards the nearest airport and began troubleshooting the issue. When it became apparent that he could not maintain altitude and would not make the diversion airport, he performed an off-airport landing in a field. During the landing the airplane struck a 3- to 4-foot-tall berm, which resulted in substantial damage to the engine mount and fuselage. During the post-accident investigation, a significant amount of water was found in the inline strainer to the engine. Follow-up interviews with the fixed base operator and pilot revealed that the pilot treated the airplane’s fuel with a 70% isopropyl alcohol (antiseptic) solution before the accident flight. The pilot was unaware that the antiseptic also contained purified water. It is likely that the airplane’s fuel became contaminated with water from the antiseptic which resulted in the loss of engine power. Review of company documentation revealed vague instructions for treating the fuel with isopropyl alcohol. For example, the instructions stated to use one bottle per 25 gallons of fuel, but did not specify the size/volume of the bottle. Specific guidance for the accident airplane was found in the manufacturer’s service information letter. The letter stated it is permissible to use any high quality isopropyl alcohol, for example one meeting Federal Specification TT-I-735a. The letter stated the isopropyl alcohol may be blended with the fuel in a concentration not greater than 1% by volume.
A loss of engine power that resulted from fuel contamination when it was treated with a 70% isopropyl alcohol solution (antiseptic) that contained water. Contributing to the accident were vague fuel treatment instructions provided by the operator.
The pilot reported that he was descending the airplane to begin patrolling a section of pipeline when, without warning, the engine began to surge between low and high power. He diverted towards the nearest airport and began troubleshooting the issue. When it became apparent that he could not maintain altitude and would not make the diversion airport, he performed an off-airport landing in a field. During the landing the airplane struck a 3- to 4-foot-tall berm, which resulted in substantial damage to the engine mount and fuselage. During the post-accident investigation, a significant amount of water was found in the inline strainer to the engine. Follow-up interviews with the fixed base operator and pilot revealed that the pilot treated the airplane’s fuel with a 70% isopropyl alcohol (antiseptic) solution before the accident flight. The pilot was unaware that the antiseptic also contained purified water. It is likely that the airplane’s fuel became contaminated with water from the antiseptic which resulted in the loss of engine power. Review of company documentation revealed vague instructions for treating the fuel with isopropyl alcohol. For example, the instructions stated to use one bottle per 25 gallons of fuel, but did not specify the size/volume of the bottle. Specific guidance for the accident airplane was found in the manufacturer’s service information letter. The letter stated it is permissible to use any high quality isopropyl alcohol, for example one meeting Federal Specification TT-I-735a. The letter stated the isopropyl alcohol may be blended with the fuel in a concentration not greater than 1% by volume.