Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Cynthiana, KY
The pilot departed on the 130 nautical mile cross country flight, with about 14 gallons of aviation fuel, or 7 gallons per side. After departure, the airplane climbed to a cruising altitude of 2,500 ft mean sea level and proceeded normally. About 50 minutes into the flight, the engine began to run rough with a simultaneous decrease in engine rpm, manifold pressure and fuel pressure. The pilot diverted to a nearby airport and attempted to troubleshoot the rough running engine by advancing the throttle, moving the mixture to full rich and activating the auxiliary fuel pump, which provided brief improvement, before fuel pressure continued to decrease. Unable to maintain level flight, the pilot attempted a forced landing in a field. During the approach, the pilot observed powerlines on short final, and the airplane’s left wing clipped a powerline resulting in a loss of control and a hard landing on rough terrain. The airplane came to rest against a fence and sustained substantial damage to the fuselage and left wing. The pilot reported that he manually dipped the fuel tanks before the flight with a calibrated fuel dipstick; however, he was unable to produce the dipstick or confirm the origin of calibration. In addition, he stated that the engine instruments indicated that he had 27 minutes of fuel remaining at the time, the engine roughness occurred. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The fuel system was intact and undamaged, the engine fuel supply lines were devoid of fuel, and the total fuel recovered from both fuel tanks was 1 quart. Based on the absence of mechanical anomalies, the lack of fuel in the fuel tanks and engine fuel supply lines, the pilot’s inability to provide or substantiate the calibration of the fuel dipstick, and his overreliance on fuel quantity instrumentation, it is likely that pilot departed with an inaccurate assessment of the available fuel, and the resulting loss of engine power was due to fuel exhaustion.
The pilot's inadequate fuel planning and preflight inspection, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion and a forced landing. Contributing to the accident was the impact with powerlines during final approach.
The pilot departed on the 130 nautical mile cross country flight, with about 14 gallons of aviation fuel, or 7 gallons per side. After departure, the airplane climbed to a cruising altitude of 2,500 ft mean sea level and proceeded normally. About 50 minutes into the flight, the engine began to run rough with a simultaneous decrease in engine rpm, manifold pressure and fuel pressure. The pilot diverted to a nearby airport and attempted to troubleshoot the rough running engine by advancing the throttle, moving the mixture to full rich and activating the auxiliary fuel pump, which provided brief improvement, before fuel pressure continued to decrease. Unable to maintain level flight, the pilot attempted a forced landing in a field. During the approach, the pilot observed powerlines on short final, and the airplane’s left wing clipped a powerline resulting in a loss of control and a hard landing on rough terrain. The airplane came to rest against a fence and sustained substantial damage to the fuselage and left wing. The pilot reported that he manually dipped the fuel tanks before the flight with a calibrated fuel dipstick; however, he was unable to produce the dipstick or confirm the origin of calibration. In addition, he stated that the engine instruments indicated that he had 27 minutes of fuel remaining at the time, the engine roughness occurred. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The fuel system was intact and undamaged, the engine fuel supply lines were devoid of fuel, and the total fuel recovered from both fuel tanks was 1 quart. Based on the absence of mechanical anomalies, the lack of fuel in the fuel tanks and engine fuel supply lines, the pilot’s inability to provide or substantiate the calibration of the fuel dipstick, and his overreliance on fuel quantity instrumentation, it is likely that pilot departed with an inaccurate assessment of the available fuel, and the resulting loss of engine power was due to fuel exhaustion.