Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

January 19, 2026 · Robinson R44 II · N996NR

Parkman, WY

Overview

Report Status
Probable Cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
January 19, 2026
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (3 uninjured)
Location
Parkman, WY
Aircraft
Robinson R44 II (2006)
Tail Number
N996NR
Operator
Native Range Capture Services
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
WPR26LA083

Two helicopters were conducting low-altitude wildlife capture operations in mountainous terrain when they collided mid-air. Both helicopters were substantially damaged; the pilots and passenger were uninjured. The pilots and passengers briefed their operational plan prior to departing. The first helicopter (N74730) was assigned to a northern sector and would perform operations starting on the north edge of that sector, working south. The second helicopter (N996NR) was assigned a sector bordering the southern boundary of the north sector and would begin its operations at the southernmost portion of its assigned sector, working north. The pilots each planned to meet at a fuel truck located near the common border of the two sectors. The operational area was in remote terrain that included hills, canyons, and ridges. The mission required the helicopters to operate close to/at ground level and included periodic landings. Approximately one hour after operations began, both helicopters arrived in the same area near the sector boundary, where they continued to independently conduct the low-altitude operations. The pilot of the second helicopter had just dropped off his passenger to complete a wildlife capture and had become airborne again. Both pilots reported they were airborne and descending slightly, when the pilot of the first helicopter saw the other helicopter converging head-on. The pilot of the first helicopter quickly applied full up collective control to attempt to climb above the flight path of the converging helicopter, and as they passed the helicopters collided. The collision resulted in substantial damage to the tail section of the first helicopter. The pilots stated they believed the accident could have been avoided with better radio communication. Additionally, the pilots reported that the terrain’s effect on radio transmissions and the operational workload prevented continuous and unreliable communication between the helicopters; therefore, they relied on see-and-avoid techniques to ensure safe separation. The pilots of both helicopters reported no mechanical malfunctions or anomalies that would have precluded normal operations.

NTSB Probable Cause

The pilots’ failure to maintain separation while conducting air work in a common operational area. Contributing to the accident was the pilots’ divided attention associated with the mission activity and unreliable radio communications.

Full Narrative

Two helicopters were conducting low-altitude wildlife capture operations in mountainous terrain when they collided mid-air. Both helicopters were substantially damaged; the pilots and passenger were uninjured. The pilots and passengers briefed their operational plan prior to departing. The first helicopter (N74730) was assigned to a northern sector and would perform operations starting on the north edge of that sector, working south. The second helicopter (N996NR) was assigned a sector bordering the southern boundary of the north sector and would begin its operations at the southernmost portion of its assigned sector, working north. The pilots each planned to meet at a fuel truck located near the common border of the two sectors. The operational area was in remote terrain that included hills, canyons, and ridges. The mission required the helicopters to operate close to/at ground level and included periodic landings. Approximately one hour after operations began, both helicopters arrived in the same area near the sector boundary, where they continued to independently conduct the low-altitude operations. The pilot of the second helicopter had just dropped off his passenger to complete a wildlife capture and had become airborne again. Both pilots reported they were airborne and descending slightly, when the pilot of the first helicopter saw the other helicopter converging head-on. The pilot of the first helicopter quickly applied full up collective control to attempt to climb above the flight path of the converging helicopter, and as they passed the helicopters collided. The collision resulted in substantial damage to the tail section of the first helicopter. The pilots stated they believed the accident could have been avoided with better radio communication. Additionally, the pilots reported that the terrain’s effect on radio transmissions and the operational workload prevented continuous and unreliable communication between the helicopters; therefore, they relied on see-and-avoid techniques to ensure safe separation. The pilots of both helicopters reported no mechanical malfunctions or anomalies that would have precluded normal operations.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time09:00 MST
Nearest Airport0nm
Flight Plan FiledNone
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftRobinson R44 II
Tail NumberN996NR
Aircraft CategoryHeli
DamageSubstantial
OperatorNative Range Capture Services
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsLycoming · IO-540-AE1A5 · Reciprocating · 245 | Lycoming · IO-540-AE1A5 · Reciprocating · 245
Seats4

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (3 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured3
Total3
Crew 1Age 46 · First Class · None
Crew 2Age 44 · Second Class · None

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind260° @ 3 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point25 F / 16 F
Altimeter30.22 inHg
Observation Time09:00
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data