Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

August 8, 1998 · Airbus Industrie A-320-231 · N302ML

Denver, CO

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
August 8, 1998
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (180 uninjured, 1 unknown outcome)
Location
Denver, CO
Aircraft
Airbus Industrie A-320-231
Tail Number
N302ML
Operator
Prime Air
Injuries
None
NTSB Number
FTW98LA351

The aircraft was pushed back from the gate and the crew set the parking brake. They notified the ground crew that they were cleared to disconnect the tug from the aircraft. The flight crew received a clearance by Ramp Control and began to taxi. The nose wheel of the aircraft then ran over one of the ground crewman's legs. According to the injured crewman, the tow bar connection to the aircraft was jammed. He disconnected the tow bar from the tug, and went to release the tow bar from the airplane's nose. He noticed the aircraft start to move, then roll over his legs. According to him, at no time following his braking instructions to the flight crew did he give them a clearance signal to initiate taxi. According to cockpit voice transcripts, a crew member replied, 'I apologize, I thought we were clear' after being told of the accident. The tow bar was still attached to the aircraft and the tug was still directly in front of the aircraft immediately following the accident. Neither the airline nor the ramp contractor's pushback procedures provide instructions for communications should there be a problem with the tow bar disconnect process. This was a contract operation with a weekly frequency.

NTSB Probable Cause

The failure of the flight crew to comply with braking instructions after being instructed by ground personnel.

Full Narrative

On August 8, 1998, at 1455 mountain daylight time, an Airbus A320-231, operated by Prime Air as TransMeridian Airlines flight 1341, was not damaged when it taxied over the leg of a ground crewman during initial taxi following push back for departure at Denver International Airport, Denver, Colorado. The airline transport rated pilot and first officer, four flight attendants and 174 passengers were not injured; however, the ground crewman received serious injuries. The aircraft was being operated as a non-scheduled international passenger flight under Title 14 CFR Part 121, and visual meteorological conditions prevailed. An IFR flight plan was filed for the flight to Cancun, Mexico. According to the captain, after the aircraft was boarded, they experienced an APU failure, which required starting engine #2 at the gate prior to push back. After starting the #2 engine, the aircraft was pushed back from the gate and the flight crew started the #1 engine. They set the parking brake while at 50% power (N2), and notified the ground crew that they were cleared to disconnect the tug from the aircraft, to which they acknowledged. No further communications were held between the flight and ground crew following the ground crewman's instructions to the flight crew to set the parking brake. The flight crew received a clearance to taxi by Ramp Control and recalled that the area appeared clear. Immediately after beginning to taxi, the captain "felt something wrong with the aircraft." The first officer stated that his "vision was inside the cockpit" when he "heard a crunching or rubbing sound" immediately after beginning to taxi. The first officer looked outside the cockpit and did not see the tug or any ground crewman. The flight crew set the parking brake, and the tug driver announced to them over the intercom that they had just injured someone from the ground crew. In a statement following the accident, the injured ground crewman, Trenton Starry, stated that after removing ground power per the captain's request, the push back was initiated. Upon entering the service road, he advised the captain that they were clear to start the #1 engine and to set the brakes, to which the captain acknowledged. The captain then cleared him to disconnect the tow bar from the aircraft. When he went to disconnect the tow bar, the connection to the aircraft was jammed. He disconnected the tow bar from the tug, and went back to the aircraft's nose gear with the intention of releasing the tow bar from the airplane. The next thing he remembered was the aircraft "rolling over [his] legs." According to him, at no time following his braking instructions to the flight crew did he give them a signal that they were cleared to initiate taxi. The operator of the push back stated that he observed Mr. Starry give the captain the signal to set the brakes and then attempt to release the tow bar. The tow bar was jammed, so the driver put the tug in reverse to ease tension. Once the tow bar was released from the vehicle, he observed Mr. Starry approach the aircraft to remove the tow bar from the airplane. He noticed the aircraft begin to move, and the nose gear then rolled over Mr. Starry's legs. The tug operator recalled borrowing Mr. Starry's headsets to notify the crew of the accident. According to cockpit voice transcripts, the tug operator said to the crew, "You just ran over my guy down here," to which one of the crew members replied, "I apologize, I thought we were clear." According to several witnesses, the aircraft traveled approximately 8 feet before stopping. The tow bar was still attached to the aircraft and the tug was still directly in front of the aircraft immediately following the accident. This was a contract operation with a weekly frequency. According to the "Pushback/Headset Communications Procedures" outlined by Integrated Airline Services (the ramp contractor), once the tow bar is disconnected from the nose of the aircraft, the tug is to be "backed clear and in view of the flight crew." The ground crew is then instructed to "advise flight 'you are clear to start #2.'" The ground crewmember is instructed to continue wearing the headsets until both engines are operating, and until the flight crew has advised that they have "2 good engine starts," and that it is "ok to disconnect headset." TransMeridian Airlines' "A-320 Aircraft Operating Manual" states that "When ready to taxi, obtain 'all clear' signal and salute ground crew and then contact ground control for taxi clearance." Neither the airline nor the ramp contractor's pushback procedures provide instructions for communications should there be a problem with the tow bar disconnect process.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time14:55 MDT
Nearest AirportDenver International (0nm)
Runway0
Flight Plan FiledIFR
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftAirbus Industrie A-320-231
Tail NumberN302ML
Aircraft CategoryAir
OperatorPrime Air
Operating RulePart 121
Engines2
Engine TypeTurbofan
Engine DetailsInt'L Aero En · V2500-A1 · Turbofan · 24800
Seats180

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (180 uninjured, 1 unknown outcome)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured180
Total181
Crew 1Age 58 · First Class

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind20° @ 10 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point43 C
Altimeter30.00 inHg
Observation Time21:53
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data